UNIVERSAL SOFTWARE  ADDS TCP/IP TO UNIVERSAL-LINK FOR          
MVS AND VSE MAlNFRAMES
      
       
  Universal Software, Inc (Brookfield, CT) has announced that its Universal-Link file transfer  
       and mailboxing system for MVS and VSE now supports the TCP/IP protocol.        
 
   
In addition to TCP/IP, Universal-Link supports the traditional BSC/3780, Async, SNA LU 1     
and LU6.2 protocols and enables MVS and VSE installations to send and receive data between   
the host computer and a variety of systems, including PCs, minicomputers, mainframes and    
VANs (Value-Added Networks). lt is used for applications requiring completely unattended    
operations such as Eletronic Commerce (EDI, EFT, ACH), POS Polling, RJE and others         
 Now, together with corporate LAN/WAN capability, Universal-Link's TCP/IP client/server
 support enables mainframe enterprises to take advantage of the economy of the Internet while 
preserving the control, security and reliability of private networks. In contrast to FTP servers, 
Universal-Link TCP/IP puts the mainframe in complete control of all data transfers. Remote         
users have no access to the mainframe files or other applications - they can receive only 
the data prepared for them in their unique Universal-Link mainframe mailbox.  
Complete data security is further ensured with Universal-Link's automatic end-to-end 
encryption techniques.         
 UNIVERSAL-LlNK TCP/IP vs FTP
                  
As you are aware, every TCP/IP implementation comes with an FTP client and server         
application. FTP has evolved in the Unix world for many years before becoming popular first         
with PCs and now recently with IBM mainframes, FTP is quite powerful and fairly efficient          
and is rapidly becoming a valuable tool in most enterprises-even on the corporate mainframe.         
 What then is the value of TCP/IP Support in Universal-Link since FTP is available 
wherever TCP/IP is available?         
The design philosophy and operation of Universal-Link is dramatically different from FTP.      
Either system can be used in most instances, but usually one approach or the other is better         
suited for a particular data transfer requirement.         
 There are many file transfer systems available for IBM mainframes today.  
Universal-Link is one of the most adaptable, and in many cases, it is the best 
available solution for your particular needs.         
The specific differences between FTP and Universal-Link are discussed in the following         
paragraphs:
Control/Security
         
FTP is a classic client/server application
The FTP server responds to requests and commands from the client. The client controls the      
file transfers. In some cases this is ideal, but in many other cases elaborate and extensive  
security measures must be added to prevent widespread misuse and abuse of your corporate  
data.
Universal-Link leaves the mainframe in complete control. 
Data is loaded into outbound mailboxes via regularly scheduled batch jobs.  
Universal-Link clients have only access to their own data in their own mailbox with no 
security nightmares. In addition, Universal-Links low-overhead, end-to-end encryption 
techniques ensures complete data security.
        
 Unattended Operations
Universal-Link is ideal for regularly scheduled transfers ,fully automated and unattended at   
both ends. 
        
Although the FTP client side can be scripted to some extent, it's not generally as 
suitable.
 Multiple Protocols 
The fact that Universal-Link supports multiple protocols allows the possibility for a single        
system with a single method of operation and a single learning curve to continue to serve your         
file transfer requirements.
FTP, of course, supports only TCP/IP
The Internet
The Internet offers an opportunity for dramatic savings in switched line telephone costs. If you         
make or receive 50 to 100 or more switched line calls (dial out or 800 line answer), then you will         
be tempted to investigate the use of the Internet. 
        
Opening up your mainframe to the Internet, however, can be fraught with danger without the     
use of a closed system like Universal-Link. For instance if you use FTP there already exists         
millions of computers with FTP client software that can talk to your server         
Universal-Link, on the other hand, will only talk to a Universal-Link client (ULFTP). If         
Universal-Link is the only application on your TCP/IP stack, then there is no danger of         
unauthorized access to your mainframe. Furthermore, when you purchase Universal-Link         
TCP/IP client and server, they come as a matched pair. That is, your Universal-Link server         
will not talk to someone elses ULFTP client.         
Lastly, each of your ULFTP clients is automatically protected from accessing each others         
data by embedded client IDs that you control (LOCID's) and passwords that each client controls. 
Complete data security is further ensured with Universal-Link low-overhead          
end-to-end encryption techniques.
Summary
Universal-Link is not intended to render FTP obsolete but rather to provide your enterprise  
with an additional secure file transfer mechanism to utilize where appropriate.
Universal Link | 
Features  | 
TCP/IP Support  | 
Non-BTAM Bisync| 
Home